Australia’S Ban On

Polynesians

Letter to the Editor It has been with great interest that I read recent articles in the “Pacific Islands Monthly” relative to Australia’s anti-Polynesian immigration law. The stand the “PIM” has. taken is commended by those whose thinking is on behalf of the dignity of man.

European and American people have observed the natural democratic ten dencies of the Tahitians which are com pletely devoid of politics. This is natural uninhibited democracy untainted by any of the isms. When my house becomes stagnant within, I open the windows and admit the fresh air.

As your excellent editorial indicated, 99 per cent, of Polynesians do not con sider immigration to Australia worthy of their consideration. But it is interesting to note that thousands of the Polynesians who volunteered to fight in the Pacific War, gave their services directly or indirectly to the defence of Australia against the Japs.

In light of mankind’s present efforts toward one world, it behoves popular government to streamline itself by the elimination of racial discrimination, and such ordinances as Australia’s Polynesian exclusion law. If we are too bigoted to make these alterations in our thinking and our government, then we may as well change the name of our democracy.

I am, etc.,

Tahiti.

David Cave.

Editorial Note: Australia does not ban all Polynesians—only those who are with out political strength. The ban on Maoris was hurriedly removed when New Zea land showed resentment, but it still re mains on Samoans, Tongans, Cook [slanders, etc.